Get in Touch:
enquire@jbcyberservices.com0330 122 6991or use the form below:
Imagine visiting a website where you can’t read the text because the contrast is too low, buttons don’t respond when you press them, or you can’t navigate without a mouse. For millions of people in the UK, this isn’t imagination — it’s their daily experience on the web.
Web accessibility means designing and building websites that everyone can use, regardless of their abilities or the assistive technologies they rely on. It’s about ensuring that a person using a screen reader, someone with limited dexterity using keyboard navigation, or an individual with colour blindness can all access your content and services effectively.
This isn’t just good practice — it’s increasingly a legal requirement, makes solid business sense, and is fundamentally the right thing to do. This guide explains what accessibility means, why it matters, and practical steps you can take to make your website more inclusive.
Web accessibility is the practice of making websites usable by as many people as possible. Whilst it particularly benefits people with disabilities, accessible design improves the experience for everyone.
People with permanent disabilities:
People with temporary limitations:
People in challenging circumstances:
Everyone benefits from:
“Accessible design is good design. Barriers faced by people with disabilities often make websites harder for everyone to use.”
Let’s look at the most common issues that make websites difficult or impossible for some users to access:
The problem: Light grey text on a white background, yellow buttons on orange backgrounds, or any colour combination that’s difficult to distinguish.
Who it affects: People with low vision, colour blindness, anyone using a device in bright sunlight.
Example: A submit button with light blue text on a white background fails contrast requirements. Many users simply won’t see it clearly.
The problem: Images without descriptive alt text mean screen reader users have no idea what the image shows.
Who it affects: Blind and visually impaired users relying on screen readers.
Example: An infographic showing your company’s growth statistics with no alt text is completely invisible to screen reader users. They’ll just hear “image” with no context about the valuable data you’re presenting.
The problem: Websites that can’t be navigated using only a keyboard, interactive elements that can’t be focused or activated without a mouse.
Who it affects: People who can’t use a mouse due to motor disabilities, power users who prefer keyboard navigation, anyone using assistive technologies.
Example: A dropdown menu that only opens on mouse hover, custom form elements that don’t respond to keyboard input, or missing focus indicators so users can’t see where they are on the page.
The problem: Links that say “click here” or “read more” without context about where they lead.
Who it affects: Screen reader users who navigate by jumping between links, people using voice control, anyone scanning the page quickly.
Example: “Click here to download our brochure” should be “Download our product brochure (PDF, 2MB)” — descriptive, informative, and useful for everyone.
The problem: Using <div> and <span> elements for everything instead of proper semantic HTML like <button>, <nav>, <article>, <header>.
Who it affects: Screen reader users who rely on proper HTML structure to understand and navigate content.
Example: Creating a button using a div styled to look like a button instead of using a proper button element means assistive technologies won’t recognize it as an interactive element.
The problem: Videos or audio that play automatically without user control, or no way to pause/stop them.
Who it affects: People using screen readers (audio conflicts with screen reader audio), people with anxiety or sensory sensitivities, anyone in a quiet environment.
Example: A background video that starts playing immediately, with tiny controls that are hard to find and use.
The problem: Form fields without proper labels, error messages that aren’t clearly associated with the relevant field, required fields not marked, unclear validation rules.
Who it affects: Everyone, but particularly problematic for screen reader users and people with cognitive disabilities.
Example: A form that just says “Error” at the top without indicating which fields have problems, or input fields with placeholder text instead of proper labels (placeholders disappear when you start typing).
The problem: Videos without captions, audio content without transcripts.
Who it affects: Deaf and hard-of-hearing users, people in sound-sensitive environments, non-native speakers, anyone who prefers reading to listening.
Example: A product demo video with no captions means deaf users can’t access the information, and it’s also less useful for indexing by search engines.
In the UK, website accessibility isn’t optional — it’s a legal requirement under the Equality Act 2010.
The Equality Act makes it unlawful to discriminate against people with disabilities. This includes providing services (such as websites) that put disabled people at a substantial disadvantage compared to non-disabled people.
Key points:
“Reasonable” depends on factors like:
For most businesses, following established accessibility guidelines (WCAG 2.1) represents a reasonable standard. Courts have found in favour of claimants where businesses failed to meet basic accessibility requirements.
Public sector bodies (government departments, councils, NHS, state schools) have additional obligations under the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) Accessibility Regulations 2018.
They must:
Whilst these regulations don’t directly apply to private businesses, they set a clear precedent for what’s considered achievable and reasonable.
There have been successful accessibility discrimination cases in the UK, including:
The trend is towards increased enforcement and higher expectations. Proactive accessibility is far better than reactive legal defence.
Beyond legal compliance, accessible websites offer tangible business benefits:
According to the UK’s Family Resources Survey, around 14.6 million people in the UK have a disability — roughly 22% of the population. That’s a substantial market that inaccessible websites exclude.
Add temporary disabilities, situational limitations, and the ageing population (older people are more likely to have accessibility needs), and accessible design benefits the majority of users at some point.
Many accessibility best practices align with good SEO:
Google explicitly considers page experience in rankings, and accessible sites tend to provide better experiences.
Accessible design principles create better experiences for all users:
Proactively addressing accessibility reduces the risk of:
Demonstrating commitment to inclusion and accessibility:
Building accessibility into your development process from the start is far more cost-effective than retrofitting later. Accessible code is typically:
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) are the internationally recognised standard for web accessibility, developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).
Current version: WCAG 2.1 (with WCAG 2.2 recently released)
Three conformance levels:
Most organisations aim for WCAG 2.1 Level AA as a reasonable and achievable standard.
WCAG is built around four core principles. Content must be:
1. Perceivable Users must be able to perceive the information being presented. This means:
2. Operable Users must be able to operate the interface. This includes:
3. Understandable Users must be able to understand the information and interface. Requirements include:
4. Robust Content must be robust enough to work with current and future technologies, including assistive technologies. This means:
You don’t need to achieve perfect accessibility overnight. Here are practical steps you can take to make meaningful improvements:
What it means: Using the right HTML element for the job instead of generic div and span elements styled to look like interactive components.
How to implement:
Why it matters: Semantic HTML provides meaning and structure that assistive technologies rely on to help users navigate and understand your content.
What it means: Every image that conveys information should have descriptive alt text.
Guidelines:
What it means: Text and important visual elements must have enough contrast against their background.
Standards:
Tools to check:
How to fix: If colours fail contrast requirements, either darken the text or lighten the background (or vice versa) until the ratio is sufficient.
What it means: All interactive elements must be usable with keyboard alone (no mouse required).
Test: Try navigating your entire website using only Tab, Shift+Tab, Enter, and arrow keys. Can you:
How to fix:
What it means: Every form input needs a visible label that’s programmatically associated with it.
Additional considerations:
What it means: Using headings (h1 through h6) to create a clear content hierarchy.
Best practices:
Why it matters: Screen reader users often navigate by headings, jumping between them to find content. A logical heading structure makes this efficient.
What it means: All video content should have captions; all audio content should have transcripts.
How to implement:
Benefits beyond accessibility: Captions help people in noisy/quiet environments, non-native speakers, and improve SEO.
What they are: Accessible Rich Internet Applications (ARIA) attributes add semantic information to HTML elements.
Important: ARIA should enhance, not replace, semantic HTML. First rule of ARIA: don’t use ARIA if you can use native HTML instead.
What it means: Write clearly and structure content for easy comprehension.
How to implement:
Automated testing tools:
Manual testing:
User testing: Where possible, include people with disabilities in your user testing. They’ll identify issues automated tools miss.
Let’s dispel some misconceptions about accessibility:
Myth: “Accessible websites look boring and basic” Reality: Accessible design and attractive design are not mutually exclusive. Many award-winning websites with stunning designs are also highly accessible.
Myth: “Accessibility is expensive and time-consuming” Reality: Building accessibility in from the start adds minimal time and cost. It’s retrofitting inaccessible sites that’s expensive. Most accessibility improvements are straightforward once you understand the principles.
Myth: “We don’t have any disabled users” Reality: You likely do, but your inaccessible website prevents them from using your services. Also, many disabilities are invisible, and users don’t announce them.
Myth: “Accessibility is only for blind users” Reality: Accessibility benefits people with visual, auditory, motor, and cognitive disabilities, plus everyone in challenging circumstances.
Myth: “We can add accessibility later” Reality: Retrofitting accessibility is much harder and more expensive than building it in from the start. Some architectural decisions are difficult to change later.
Myth: “Automated tools are enough” Reality: Automated tools catch maybe 30-40% of accessibility issues. Manual testing and user testing with people with disabilities are essential.
At JB Cyber Services, we believe accessibility is a fundamental aspect of good web development, not an optional extra.
We integrate accessibility into every stage of our development process:
Design phase:
Development phase:
Testing phase:
All websites we build aim for WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance as a minimum standard. We:
For existing websites, we offer accessibility audits that:
Accessibility isn’t a one-time checkbox — it’s an ongoing commitment. We:
We approach every project with inclusive design principles:
If you’re new to accessibility, here’s how to begin:
This week:
This month:
This quarter:
Ongoing:
Web accessibility isn’t about compliance checklists or begrudgingly meeting minimum legal requirements — it’s about building a web that works for everyone.
The financial case for accessibility is clear: it expands your potential audience, reduces legal risk, improves SEO, and creates better experiences for all users. The legal case is increasingly compelling, with the Equality Act 2010 making inaccessible websites potentially unlawful. The ethical case is simple: everyone deserves equal access to information and services.
The good news is that accessibility doesn’t require massive budgets or complete rebuilds. With understanding, commitment, and the right approach, you can make significant improvements relatively quickly. Building accessibility into your development process from the start costs little more than building inaccessibly.
Whether you’re launching a new website or improving an existing one, prioritising accessibility is one of the most important decisions you can make. It’s not just the right thing to do — it’s good business sense, and it’s increasingly a legal requirement.
At JB Cyber Services, we’re committed to building websites that everyone can use. If you’d like help assessing your website’s accessibility, implementing improvements, or ensuring your next project is accessible from the ground up, we’re here to help.
The web should be for everyone. Let’s make sure yours is.
or use the form below: